Before I jump into a real eval - is there a way to express logic in
the forms?
i.e. If the contents of this field is this, go to this section.
Thank you.
yes. if you look at the demo video at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo8LaFFSkV8 you'll see examples of
logic/branching. we support full xpath expressions and they are
powerful enough to do medical protocols...
···
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:39, Frank R wrote: > Before I jump into a real eval - is there a way to express logic in > the forms? > > i.e. If the contents of this field is this, go to this section. > > Thank you. > > -- > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > Options: http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en >The forms can contain both Skip Logic and data constraints.
The way it's done in the XML is a section called BIND.
For every piece of data you are collection (say, question 1) there is a node
in the Instance.
*
···
* * * * * * * **for ever Node, there can be a BINDing (though it's not necessary).
All by itself, that doesn't do anything. But, if you want the question to be
required, this is where you add that control.
Now, let's say that you want to add a data constraint. Question 1 is this,
"What is your Age?"
You can't interview children, so the answer must be older than 18. You don't
want someone accidentally putting in the year of their birth, or some other
crazy number, so you constrain the number to be less than 100. Oh, and it
has to be a number, not a word.
*<bind nodeset="/data/question1" required="true()" constraint=". > 17 and
. < 100" * type="int" ** />
If someone puts in a crazy number for age, it won't accept it. You might
want to add an error message, so you can do that too:
*
There are lots of kinds of data constraints, you can use regular expressions
in there, like if the answer must be a 3 digit number, you can constrain
like this:
<bind nodeset="/data/question1" required="true()" type="int"
constraint="regex(., '^\d\d\d$')" jr:constraintMsg="The number must be 3
digits" />
A lot of people think these kinds of expressions are awesome, I just think
they are regular. Anyway, useful stuff.
Notice that there is a datatype constraint in there as well: *type="int"
*This will make sure only numbers (integers) can be entered and will pop up
the numerical keyboard for the user.
Other types of *types *are:
date
time
geopoint
string
there are some others, they control how the interface presents to the user.
If the *type="geopoint" *then the user will see a control to get and record
the GPS position.
Datatypes are useful in combination with Preloaders, for example, you can
record the start time of your survey (or the end time, or some other time)
like this:
That records the time that the survey starts and records it into a node
called "start".
You asked about Skip Logic as well, and you do that in the BIND also by
making use of Relevant property.
You basically add this to a question saying, THIS question should be
presented to the user IF the answer to a previous question is THAT.
Q1 asks "Do you have a dog or a cat?"
Q2 asks "What is your dog's name?"
Q3 asks "What is your cat's name?"
So, Q2 is only RELEVANT if Q1's answer is "dog". Get it?
Q3 is only RELEVANT if Q1's answer is "cat".
So, in the bind, it gets written like this:
ODK will only present the cat question to cat owners, the dog question to
dog owners.
There are multiple ways to use the RELEVANT property.
Like the Dog/Cat question above, Relevant IF some other question equals some
value.
relevant="/data/q16 = '88'"
If you want to ask ten questions about dogs and ten questions about cats,
you just give the appropriate * relevant="/data/q1= 'dog'" *to all the
dog questions and the same for the cat. So, you can skip whole sections that
way.
You can combine more than one Relevant value by putting "and" between them.
*relevant="/data/q5= '1' and /data/q6 = '88'" *
You can also use negatives, that is, Question is Relevant IF another
question's value does NOT equal something.
*relevant="/data/q5 != '0'" *
When working with multiple-select questions , where users can
select more than one answer, you can't use *node='value' *because there may
be more than one value in there. So, you can use *selected(node, 'value')
*
*relevant="selected(/data/q11, '88')" *
Yes, it can be combined with other Relevants for other nodes
- relevant="/data/q9 = '1' and selected(/data/q11, '88')" *
You can even say THIS question is Relevant only IF the multiple choice
question does NOT have a certain value selected.
relevant="not(selected(/data/q11, '0'))"
OK, that's what I have to say about that. I write a lot of skip logic and
data constraints, so I have figured out some tricks. Also some caveats, like
the ODK Form Validator (though it is awesome, all praise to the mighty
Validator) does not get all mistakes in the BIND.
If you are writing some BIND statements, and you refer to a non-existent
node (like you mix up the letter 'O' and the number '0' or something like
that, you have a node called /data/O01, but you spell it /data/OO1) the
validator will not catch it, but your form will crash like a lead balloon.
You can watch it crash with the adb logcat, and you will see an error
message "Node does not exist".
Good luck with your stuff, m0j0 OUT!
☞§※⌘:airplane:
~Neil
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Frank R frankruss.ny@gmail.com wrote:
Before I jump into a real eval - is there a way to express logic in
the forms?i.e. If the contents of this field is this, go to this section.
Thank you.
--
Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com
Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.comopendatakit%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Options: http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en
this is too good to stay on the mailing list. i've added it to
http://code.google.com/p/opendatakit/wiki/XFormLogicExplained
···
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 18:15, Neil Hendrick wrote: > The forms can contain both Skip Logic and data constraints. > The way it's done in the XML is a section called BIND. > > For every piece of data you are collection (say, question 1) there is a node > in the Instance. > > > > > > > > for ever Node, there can be a BINDing (though it's not necessary). > > > > All by itself, that doesn't do anything. But, if you want the question to be > required, this is where you add that control. > > > > Now, let's say that you want to add a data constraint. Question 1 is this, > "What is your Age?" > You can't interview children, so the answer must be older than 18. You don't > want someone accidentally putting in the year of their birth, or some other > crazy number, so you constrain the number to be less than 100. Oh, and it > has to be a number, not a word. > > > > If someone puts in a crazy number for age, it won't accept it. You might > want to add an error message, so you can do that too: > > > > > There are lots of kinds of data constraints, you can use regular expressions > in there, like if the answer must be a 3 digit number, you can constrain > like this: > > constraint="regex(., '^\d\d\d$')" jr:constraintMsg="The number must be 3 > digits" /> > > A lot of people think these kinds of expressions are awesome, I just think > they are regular. Anyway, useful stuff. > > Notice that there is a datatype constraint in there as well: type="int" > This will make sure only numbers (integers) can be entered and will pop up > the numerical keyboard for the user. > > Other types of types are: > date > time > geopoint > string > > there are some others, they control how the interface presents to the user. > If the type="geopoint" then the user will see a control to get and record > the GPS position. > > Datatypes are useful in combination with Preloaders, for example, you can > record the start time of your survey (or the end time, or some other time) > like this: > > jr:preloadParams="start"/> > > That records the time that the survey starts and records it into a node > called "start". > > You asked about Skip Logic as well, and you do that in the BIND also by > making use of Relevant property. > You basically add this to a question saying, THIS question should be > presented to the user IF the answer to a previous question is THAT. > > Q1 asks "Do you have a dog or a cat?" > Q2 asks "What is your dog's name?" > Q3 asks "What is your cat's name?" > > So, Q2 is only RELEVANT if Q1's answer is "dog". Get it? > Q3 is only RELEVANT if Q1's answer is "cat". > > So, in the bind, it gets written like this: > > > > > > ODK will only present the cat question to cat owners, the dog question to > dog owners. > > There are multiple ways to use the RELEVANT property. > > Like the Dog/Cat question above, Relevant IF some other question equals some > value. > > relevant="/data/q16 = '88'" > > If you want to ask ten questions about dogs and ten questions about cats, > you just give the appropriate relevant="/data/q1= 'dog'" to all the dog > questions and the same for the cat. So, you can skip whole sections that > way. > > You can combine more than one Relevant value by putting "and" between them. > > relevant="/data/q5= '1' and /data/q6 = '88'" > > You can also use negatives, that is, Question is Relevant IF another > question's value does NOT equal something. > > relevant="/data/q5 != '0'" > > When working with multiple-select questions , where users can select > more than one answer, you can't use node='value' because there may be more > than one value in there. So, you can use selected(node, 'value') > > relevant="selected(/data/q11, '88')" > > Yes, it can be combined with other Relevants for other nodes > > relevant="/data/q9 = '1' and selected(/data/q11, '88')" > > You can even say THIS question is Relevant only IF the multiple choice > question does NOT have a certain value selected. > > relevant="not(selected(/data/q11, '0'))" > > > OK, that's what I have to say about that. I write a lot of skip logic and > data constraints, so I have figured out some tricks. Also some caveats, like > the ODK Form Validator (though it is awesome, all praise to the mighty > Validator) does not get all mistakes in the BIND. > > If you are writing some BIND statements, and you refer to a non-existent > node (like you mix up the letter 'O' and the number '0' or something like > that, you have a node called /data/O01, but you spell it /data/OO1) the > validator will not catch it, but your form will crash like a lead balloon. > > You can watch it crash with the adb logcat, and you will see an error > message "Node does not exist". > > Good luck with your stuff, m0j0 OUT! > > ☞§※⌘✈☂ > ~Neil > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Frank R wrote: >> >> Before I jump into a real eval - is there a way to express logic in >> the forms? >> >> i.e. If the contents of this field is this, go to this section. >> >> Thank you. >> >> -- >> Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com >> Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> Options: http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > -- > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > Options: http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en >Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in any
forum Ever. 
Thank you so much.
Frank
···
On Oct 14, 9:15 pm, Neil Hendrick wrote: > The forms can contain both Skip Logic and data constraints. > The way it's done in the XML is a section called BIND. > > For every piece of data you are collection (say, question 1) there is a node > in the Instance. > > * > * > * > * > * > * > * > * > ** > > for ever Node, there can be a BINDing (though it's not necessary). > > ** > > All by itself, that doesn't do anything. But, if you want the question to be > required, this is where you add that control. > > ** > > Now, let's say that you want to add a data constraint. Question 1 is this, > "What is your Age?" > You can't interview children, so the answer must be older than 18. You don't > want someone accidentally putting in the year of their birth, or some other > crazy number, so you constrain the number to be less than 100. Oh, and it > has to be a number, not a word. > > ** > > If someone puts in a crazy number for age, it won't accept it. You might > want to add an error message, so you can do that too: > > * > * > > There are lots of kinds of data constraints, you can use regular expressions > in there, like if the answer must be a 3 digit number, you can constrain > like this: > > * constraint="regex(., '^\d\d\d$')" jr:constraintMsg="The number must be 3 > digits" />* > > A lot of people think these kinds of expressions are awesome, I just think > they are regular. Anyway, useful stuff. > > Notice that there is a datatype constraint in there as well: *type="int" > *This will make sure only numbers (integers) can be entered and will pop up > the numerical keyboard for the user. > > Other types of *types *are: > *date > time > geopoint > string* > > there are some others, they control how the interface presents to the user. > If the *type="geopoint" *then the user will see a control to get and record > the GPS position. > > Datatypes are useful in combination with Preloaders, for example, you can > record the start time of your survey (or the end time, or some other time) > like this: > > * jr:preloadParams="start"/>* > > That records the time that the survey starts and records it into a node > called "start". > > You asked about Skip Logic as well, and you do that in the BIND also by > making use of *Relevant* property. > You basically add this to a question saying, THIS question should be > presented to the user IF the answer to a previous question is THAT. > > Q1 asks "Do you have a dog or a cat?" > Q2 asks "What is your dog's name?" > Q3 asks "What is your cat's name?" > > So, Q2 is only RELEVANT if Q1's answer is "dog". Get it? > Q3 is only RELEVANT if Q1's answer is "cat". > > So, in the bind, it gets written like this: > > * > * > ** > > ODK will only present the cat question to cat owners, the dog question to > dog owners. > > There are multiple ways to use the RELEVANT property. > > Like the Dog/Cat question above, Relevant IF some other question equals some > value. > > *relevant="/data/q16 = '88'"* > > If you want to ask ten questions about dogs and ten questions about cats, > you just give the appropriate * relevant="**/data/q1**= 'dog'" *to all the > dog questions and the same for the cat. So, you can skip whole sections that > way. > > You can combine more than one Relevant value by putting "and" between them. > > *relevant="/data/q5= '1' and /data/q6 = '88'" * > > You can also use negatives, that is, Question is Relevant IF another > question's value does NOT equal something. > > *relevant="**/data/q5** != '0'" * > > When working with multiple-select questions **, where users can > select more than one answer, you can't use *node='value' *because there may > be more than one value in there. So, you can use *selected(node, 'value') > * > *relevant="selected(/data/q11, '88')" * > > Yes, it can be combined with other Relevants for other nodes > > * relevant="/data/q9 = '1' and selected(/data/q11, '88')" * > > You can even say THIS question is Relevant only IF the multiple choice > question does NOT have a certain value selected. > > *relevant="not(selected(/data/q11, '0'))"* > > OK, that's what I have to say about that. I write a lot of skip logic and > data constraints, so I have figured out some tricks. Also some caveats, like > the ODK Form Validator (though it is awesome, all praise to the mighty > Validator) does not get all mistakes in the BIND. > > If you are writing some BIND statements, and you refer to a non-existent > node (like you mix up the letter 'O' and the number '0' or something like > that, you have a node called /data/O01, but you spell it /data/OO1) the > validator will not catch it, but your form will crash like a lead balloon. > > You can watch it crash with the adb logcat, and you will see an error > message "Node does not exist". > > Good luck with your stuff, m0j0 OUT! > > ☞§※⌘✈☂ > ~Neil > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Frank R wrote: > > Before I jump into a real eval - is there a way to express logic in > > the forms? > > > i.e. If the contents of this field is this, go to this section. > > > Thank you. > > > -- > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=enthat's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day.
☞§※⌘:airplane:
~Neil
···
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R wrote:Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in any
forum Ever.Frank
You earned it, brother. That was the most helpful post I've ever seen in
my entire life. Thank you for the
random act of kindness - and great generosity with your time.
···
__________________________________________________________________________________________On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Neil Hendrick mojotexas@gmail.com wrote:
that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day.
☞§※⌘:airplane:
~NeilOn Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R frankruss.ny@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in any
forum Ever.Frank
--
Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com
Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.comopendatakit%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Options: http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en
Hi, I am both very new to ODK and programming in general. I am
attempting to program data validation using answers from previous
questions.
Using the above post as my guide, here is my current, yet wrong,
attempt:
I keep getting the following error: Invalid XPath expression [. <= 13
& HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/Relation . = 2]!
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix the error?
···
On Oct 15, 1:57 pm, Frank Russ wrote: > You earned it, brother. That was the most helpful post I've ever seen in > my entire life. Thank you for the > random act of kindness - and great generosity with your time. > > ___________________________________________________________________________ _______________ > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Neil Hendrick wrote: > > that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day. > > > ☞§※⌘✈☂ > > ~Neil > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R wrote: > > >> Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in any > >> forum Ever. :) Thank you so much. > > >> Frank > > >> -- > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=enIt looks like you have an extra "." just before the equals of the second
part of the constraint ( .../Relation . = 2).
I think you wanted
<bind nodeset="/HouseholdSurvey/
···
> > HouseholdMember/Age" required="true()" > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ > Relation = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be > married." />On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Ulli unischan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I am both very new to ODK and programming in general. I am
attempting to program data validation using answers from previous
questions.
Using the above post as my guide, here is my current, yet wrong,
attempt:I keep getting the following error: Invalid XPath expression [. <= 13
& HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/Relation . = 2]!Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix the error?
On Oct 15, 1:57 pm, Frank Russ frankruss...@gmail.com wrote:
You earned it, brother. That was the most helpful post I've ever seen
in
my entire life. Thank you for the
random act of kindness - and great generosity with your time.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Neil Hendrick mojote...@gmail.com wrote:
that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day.
☞§※⌘:airplane:
~NeilOn Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R frankruss...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in any
forum Ever.Frank
--
Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com
Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.comopendatakit%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com
<opendatakit%2Bunsubscribe@googlegr oups.com>
Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en--
Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com
Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.comopendatakit%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Options: http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en
--
Mitch Sundt
Software Engineer
http://www.OpenDataKit.org
University of Washington
mitchellsundt@gmail.com
Thank you, but I am still getting the same error.
···
On Nov 16, 1:08 pm, Mitch Sundt wrote: > It looks like you have an extra "." just before the equals of the second > part of the constraint ( .../Relation . = 2). > I think you wanted > > > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ > > Relation = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be > > married." /> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Ulli wrote: > > Hi, I am both very new to ODK and programming in general. I am > > attempting to program data validation using answers from previous > > questions. > > Using the above post as my guide, here is my current, yet wrong, > > attempt: > > > > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ > > Relation . = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be > > married." /> > > > I keep getting the following error: Invalid XPath expression [. <= 13 > > & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/Relation . = 2]! > > > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix the error? > > > On Oct 15, 1:57 pm, Frank Russ wrote: > > > You earned it, brother. That was the most helpful post I've ever seen > > in > > > my entire life. Thank you for the > > > random act of kindness - and great generosity with your time. > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > _______________ > > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Neil Hendrick wrote: > > > > that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day. > > > > > ☞§※⌘✈☂ > > > > ~Neil > > > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R wrote: > > > > >> Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in any > > > >> forum Ever. :) Thank you so much. > > > > >> Frank > > > > >> -- > > > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > > > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > > > > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > > -- > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > -- > Mitch Sundt > Software Engineerhttp://www.OpenDataKit.org > University of Washington > mitchellsu...@gmail.comUse AND in place of &
Thank you, but I am still getting the same error.
It looks like you have an extra "." just before the equals of the second
part of the constraint ( .../Relation . = 2).
I think you wanted<bind nodeset="/HouseholdSurvey/
HouseholdMember/Age" required="true()"
constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/
Relation = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be
married." />
Hi, I am both very new to ODK and programming in general. I am
attempting to program data validation using answers from previous
questions.
Using the above post as my guide, here is my current, yet wrong,
attempt:I keep getting the following error: Invalid XPath expression [. <= 13
& HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/Relation . = 2]!Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix the error?
You earned it, brother. That was the most helpful post I've ever
seen
···
> On Nov 16, 1:08 pm, Mitch Sundt wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Ulli wrote: >> > On Oct 15, 1:57 pm, Frank Russ wrote: >> > in >> > > my entire life. Thank you for the >> > > random act of kindness - and great generosity with your time. >> >> > ___________________________________________________________________________ >> > _______________ >> >> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Neil Hendrick wrote: >> > > > that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day. >> >> > > > ☞§※⌘✈☂ >> > > > ~Neil >> >> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R wrote: >> >> > > >> Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in any >> > > >> forum Ever. :) Thank you so much. >> >> > > >> Frank >> >> > > >> -- >> > > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com >> > > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> > >> > > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en >> >> > -- >> > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com >> > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en >> >> -- >> Mitch Sundt >> Software Engineerhttp://www.OpenDataKit.org >> University of Washington >> mitchellsu...@gmail.com > > -- > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > Options: http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=enNo dice...
···
On Nov 16, 2:44 pm, Samuel Mbugua wrote: > Use AND in place of & > > > > > > > > > Thank you, but I am still getting the same error. > > > On Nov 16, 1:08 pm, Mitch Sundt wrote: > >> It looks like you have an extra "." just before the equals of the second > >> part of the constraint ( .../Relation . = 2). > >> I think you wanted > > >> >> > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ > >> > Relation = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be > >> > married." /> > >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Ulli wrote: > >> > Hi, I am both very new to ODK and programming in general. I am > >> > attempting to program data validation using answers from previous > >> > questions. > >> > Using the above post as my guide, here is my current, yet wrong, > >> > attempt: > > >> > >> > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ > >> > Relation . = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be > >> > married." /> > > >> > I keep getting the following error: Invalid XPath expression [. <= 13 > >> > & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/Relation . = 2]! > > >> > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix the error? > > >> > On Oct 15, 1:57 pm, Frank Russ wrote: > >> > > You earned it, brother. That was the most helpful post I've ever > seen > >> > in > >> > > my entire life. Thank you for the > >> > > random act of kindness - and great generosity with your time. > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > >> > _______________ > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Neil Hendrick wrote: > >> > > > that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day. > > >> > > > ☞§※⌘✈☂ > >> > > > ~Neil > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R wrote: > > >> > > >> Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in > any > >> > > >> forum Ever. :) Thank you so much. > > >> > > >> Frank > > >> > > >> -- > >> > > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > >> > > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > >> > > >> > > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > >> > -- > >> > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > >> > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > > > > > > > > > >> > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > >> -- > >> Mitch Sundt > >> Software Engineerhttp://www.OpenDataKit.org > >> University of Washington > >> mitchellsu...@gmail.com > > > -- > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=encan you send dpaste.com the form and send me (or the list) a link?
···
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:02, Ulli wrote: > No dice... > > On Nov 16, 2:44 pm, Samuel Mbugua wrote: >> Use AND in place of & >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thank you, but I am still getting the same error. >> >> > On Nov 16, 1:08 pm, Mitch Sundt wrote: >> >> It looks like you have an extra "." just before the equals of the second >> >> part of the constraint ( .../Relation . = 2). >> >> I think you wanted >> >> >> > >> > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ >> >> > Relation = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be >> >> > married." /> >> >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Ulli wrote: >> >> > Hi, I am both very new to ODK and programming in general. I am >> >> > attempting to program data validation using answers from previous >> >> > questions. >> >> > Using the above post as my guide, here is my current, yet wrong, >> >> > attempt: >> >> >> > > >> > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ >> >> > Relation . = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be >> >> > married." /> >> >> >> > I keep getting the following error: Invalid XPath expression [. <= 13 >> >> > & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/Relation . = 2]! >> >> >> > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix the error? >> >> >> > On Oct 15, 1:57 pm, Frank Russ wrote: >> >> > > You earned it, brother. That was the most helpful post I've ever >> seen >> >> > in >> >> > > my entire life. Thank you for the >> >> > > random act of kindness - and great generosity with your time. >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________ >> >> >> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Neil Hendrick wrote: >> >> > > > that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day. >> >> >> > > > ☞§※⌘✈☂ >> >> > > > ~Neil >> >> >> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R wrote: >> >> >> > > >> Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in >> any >> >> > > >> forum Ever. :) Thank you so much. >> >> >> > > >> Frank >> >> >> > > >> -- >> >> > > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com >> >> > > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> >> >> > >> >> > > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en >> >> >> > -- >> >> > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com >> >> > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en >> >> >> -- >> >> Mitch Sundt >> >> Software Engineerhttp://www.OpenDataKit.org >> >> University of Washington >> >> mitchellsu...@gmail.com >> >> > -- >> > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com >> > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > -- > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > Options: http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en >Here goes: http://dpaste.com/276126/
Thank you for taking a look.
···
On Nov 16, 3:03 pm, Yaw Anokwa wrote: > can you send dpaste.com the form and send me (or the list) a link? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:02, Ulli wrote: > > No dice... > > > On Nov 16, 2:44 pm, Samuel Mbugua wrote: > >> Use AND in place of & > > >> > Thank you, but I am still getting the same error. > > >> > On Nov 16, 1:08 pm, Mitch Sundt wrote: > >> >> It looks like you have an extra "." just before the equals of the second > >> >> part of the constraint ( .../Relation . = 2). > >> >> I think you wanted > > >> >> >> >> > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ > >> >> > Relation = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be > >> >> > married." /> > >> >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Ulli wrote: > >> >> > Hi, I am both very new to ODK and programming in general. I am > >> >> > attempting to program data validation using answers from previous > >> >> > questions. > >> >> > Using the above post as my guide, here is my current, yet wrong, > >> >> > attempt: > > >> >> > >> >> > constraint= ". <= 13 & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/ > >> >> > Relation . = 2" jr:constraintMsg="Respondent too young to be > >> >> > married." /> > > >> >> > I keep getting the following error: Invalid XPath expression [. <= 13 > >> >> > & HouseholdSurvey/HouseholdMember/Relation . = 2]! > > >> >> > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix the error? > > >> >> > On Oct 15, 1:57 pm, Frank Russ wrote: > >> >> > > You earned it, brother. That was the most helpful post I've ever > >> seen > >> >> > in > >> >> > > my entire life. Thank you for the > >> >> > > random act of kindness - and great generosity with your time. > > >> ___________________________________________________________________________ > > >> >> > _______________ > > >> >> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Neil Hendrick wrote: > >> >> > > > that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day. > > >> >> > > > ☞§※⌘✈☂ > >> >> > > > ~Neil > > >> >> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Frank R wrote: > > >> >> > > >> Wow. I think we have a winner for: greatest response Ever in > >> any > >> >> > > >> forum Ever. :) Thank you so much. > > >> >> > > >> Frank > > >> >> > > >> -- > >> >> > > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > >> >> > > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > >> >> > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > >> > > >> >> > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > >> >> -- > >> >> Mitch Sundt > >> >> Software Engineerhttp://www.OpenDataKit.org > >> >> University of Washington > >> >> mitchellsu...@gmail.com > > >> > -- > >> > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > >> > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > >> > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=en > > > -- > > Post: opendatakit@googlegroups.com > > Unsubscribe: opendatakit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > > Options:http://groups.google.com/group/opendatakit?hl=enYou will need a / before householdsurvey ie < ;=13 and
/Householdsurvey/.....
···
On 17 Nov 2010 00:16, "Ulli" wrote:Here goes: http://dpaste.com/276126/
Thank you for taking a look.
On Nov 16, 3:03 pm, Yaw Anokwa yano...@gmail.com wrote:
can you send dpaste.com the form and s...
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:02, Ulli unisc...@gmail.com wrote:
No dice...
On Nov 16, 2:...
Still getting the error.
···
On Nov 16, 4:21 pm, Samuel Mbugua wrote: > You will need a / before householdsurvey ie < ;=13 and > /Householdsurvey/..... > On 17 Nov 2010 00:16, "Ulli" wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here goes:http://dpaste.com/276126/ > > > Thank you for taking a look. > > > On Nov 16, 3:03 pm, Yaw Anokwa wrote: > > > can you send dpaste.com the form and s... > > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:02, Ulli wrote: > > > > No dice... > > > > > On Nov 16, 2:...http://dpaste.com/276412/ works for me. try it.